slackercentral.com messageboard  

Go Back   slackercentral.com messageboard > Main boards > The Debate Club

 
Thread Tools Reply
Old 11-28-02, 06:15 PM   #1
opus512
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cherry Capitol of the World, Bitch!
Posts: 71,507
Is the sniper case terrorism?

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/28/sn....ap/index.html

Quote:
MANASSAS, Virginia (AP) -- When the Virginia Legislature passed a bill this year authorizing the death penalty for acts of terrorism, lawmakers hoped their work would be a mere precaution that never had to be implemented.

But just three months after its enactment, sniper suspects John Lee Malvo and John Allen Muhammad are being prosecuted under the new law.

"We envisioned Osama bin Laden. But what we're talking about in the sniper case is definitely terrorism," said the law's chief sponsor, state Delegate David Albo.

Experts say the public terror created by the three-week series of shootings and the sniper's demands for a $10 million ransom make the law an easy fit.

In fact, the law is one of the reasons U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft sent the pair to Virginia for prosecution, giving the state precedence over Maryland.

Ashcroft wanted the pair to face the "ultimate punishment," and Virginia's new law increases the chances of obtaining the death penalty in a state that trails only Texas in the number of people executed in the last 25 years.
I've been waiting for them to say it and they finally have. I can't view it as act of terrorism in the same vien as the WTC attacks, or Oklahoma City.

Certainly people were 'terrorized' by the snipers, but IMO it was more a serial killing, the money demand was never anything to be taken seriously, I htink it was more to throw the law off the trial.

Taken to the extreme, a school bully could be a 'terrorist', as he terrorizes other children in the schoolyard. I think there are more then sufficient laws already in place to more then convict the two of multiple murders, why add on more?

Wouldn't it be the same arguement as was made against inacting 'hate crime' legislation?
__________________

We're all Nero, and we're all playing cheap plastic Chinese fiddles.

When the Rebels become the Tyrants, Revolution takes on a New Meaning.

The only truth that I fear is the dominance of opinion over thought, of partisan ideology over compromise, of emotional self righteous morality over intellectual reasoning.

"We must always take heed that we buy no more from strangers than we sell them, for so should we impoverish ourselves and enrich them."
--- Sir. Thomas Smith, England, 1549.
opus512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 07:21 PM   #2
EG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corner of Kiss My Butt Ave and No Friggin Way Ln
Posts: 46,075
Blog Entries: 10
put down the crack pipe....

it wasnt an act of terror?

shooting school kids?

I beg to disagree.......

domestic terrorism just like OKC
__________________

The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them
The family that shoots together has interlocking fields of fire




EG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 07:35 PM   #3
Hydra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Brisbane, Aus
Posts: 30,675
The guy was a murderer, not a terrorist.
If he's a terrorist, you guys have been under attack for a very long time.
Hydra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 07:54 PM   #4
EG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corner of Kiss My Butt Ave and No Friggin Way Ln
Posts: 46,075
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by Wamphyr
The guy was a murderer, not a terrorist.
If he's a terrorist, you guys have been under attack for a very long time.
you say tomatoe I say terrorist........
__________________

The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them
The family that shoots together has interlocking fields of fire




EG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 08:09 PM   #5
Hydra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Brisbane, Aus
Posts: 30,675
Quote:
Originally posted by EGhadsGhost


you say tomatoe I say terrorist........
Rapists are terrorists too now I take it? How about people who hold up the local gas station?
Hydra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 08:49 PM   #6
Babel-17
"Say what?"
 
Babel-17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 16,972
Unless I'm shown otherwise I'm operating under the belief that those dudes had strong pro militant Islamic fundamentalist beliefs ..... compounded with their murderous acts classifying them as terrorists is no big stretch.

Being psychotic or delusional etc. does not free them from that label imo.
__________________

"As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: you liberate a city by destroying it. Words are to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests." –Gore Vidal

“No matter how imperfect things are, if you’ve got a free press, everything is correctable. Without it, everything is concealable.” -Tom Stoppard
Babel-17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 09:21 PM   #7
EG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corner of Kiss My Butt Ave and No Friggin Way Ln
Posts: 46,075
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by Wamphyr


Rapists are terrorists too now I take it? How about people who hold up the local gas station?
those guys didnt commit rape nor robbery........

dont mix the fruit
__________________

The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them
The family that shoots together has interlocking fields of fire




EG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 09:52 PM   #8
opus512
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cherry Capitol of the World, Bitch!
Posts: 71,507
Well, I still think they more fit the pattern of serial killers then terrorists, and I still think there are more then enough applicable laws already on the books to not only convict them but sentance them to death. Instead, they are going to try them under a bunch of new laws, untested in court, and take a chance on screwing the case up. Of course they won't walk, and when they don't, they will bend the law and Constitution so much to fit their desired outcome, it won't be pretty. Why take the chance?
__________________

We're all Nero, and we're all playing cheap plastic Chinese fiddles.

When the Rebels become the Tyrants, Revolution takes on a New Meaning.

The only truth that I fear is the dominance of opinion over thought, of partisan ideology over compromise, of emotional self righteous morality over intellectual reasoning.

"We must always take heed that we buy no more from strangers than we sell them, for so should we impoverish ourselves and enrich them."
--- Sir. Thomas Smith, England, 1549.
opus512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 10:05 PM   #9
Perpetualis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Limbo
Posts: 2,473
What difference does it make if they are serial killers or terrorists?


They are directly causing the deaths of innocent citizens.

Who gives a crap if they are doing it for the great alah or for the little voices in their head?

IMO lables like murderer and terrorist are interchangable. They may differ in motivation but in principle they are the same thing and should be treated as such.

Leave the politics out of that shit....
Perpetualis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 10:28 PM   #10
FluxCapacitor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Noitacol
Posts: 13,064
IMO, terrorist implies that the person(s) are trying to make a political statement or further some anti-government cause with their killing. I don't know exactly why these people were killing, they said money but that didn't seem to be the reason from the beginning. Whatever their reasons, I don't think there was anything particularly anti-government about it, so this should be treated as a multiple-murder case.

It probably doesn't matter anyway. They're going to get the death penalty regardless.
__________________

no biggiez
FluxCapacitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-02, 11:44 PM   #11
EG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corner of Kiss My Butt Ave and No Friggin Way Ln
Posts: 46,075
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by opus512
Well, I still think they more fit the pattern of serial killers then terrorists, and I still think there are more then enough applicable laws already on the books to not only convict them but sentance them to death. Instead, they are going to try them under a bunch of new laws, untested in court, and take a chance on screwing the case up. Of course they won't walk, and when they don't, they will bend the law and Constitution so much to fit their desired outcome, it won't be pretty. Why take the chance?
negative...........
__________________

The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them
The family that shoots together has interlocking fields of fire




EG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-02, 12:13 AM   #12
GrimFaceOfReality
Aurum User
 
GrimFaceOfReality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 9,299
To me, whether they were terrorists or serial killers hinges on their demands for cash. The minutes you start making demands, financial or otherwise, while killing people and terrorizing communities, you are no longer a killer but a terrorist as well.
__________________

"Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines."

"Success comes from good judgement, good judgment comes from experience, experience comes from bad judgement."

"For a century and a half now, America and Japan have formed one of the great and enduring alliances of modern times."— Bush The Second, Tokyo, February 18, 2002

"Can one claim to combat hate, aggression and intolerance when one’s methods are hateful, aggressive, and intolerant?"

www.maxthon.com IE/Unsuck
GrimFaceOfReality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-02, 02:54 AM   #13
MegaB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 9
When all is said and done. Anyone who puts the frightners into you, is terrorising you. Therefore the term terrorist. I think that is utter bulls**t.
MegaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-02, 04:02 AM   #14
opus512
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cherry Capitol of the World, Bitch!
Posts: 71,507
Quote:
Originally posted by Perpetualis
What difference does it make if they are serial killers or terrorists?
The difference, IMO, is that there are already more then enough laws on the books to try, and convict, them, why take the chance charging them under new laws that have never been tested in court before?

Besides that, it opens up a whole slew of possible new definitions of 'terrorism' now, same as, for example, everyone using the RICO law for things it was never intended to be used for, muddying the meaning and intent of the law.
__________________

We're all Nero, and we're all playing cheap plastic Chinese fiddles.

When the Rebels become the Tyrants, Revolution takes on a New Meaning.

The only truth that I fear is the dominance of opinion over thought, of partisan ideology over compromise, of emotional self righteous morality over intellectual reasoning.

"We must always take heed that we buy no more from strangers than we sell them, for so should we impoverish ourselves and enrich them."
--- Sir. Thomas Smith, England, 1549.
opus512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-02, 08:49 AM   #15
EG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corner of Kiss My Butt Ave and No Friggin Way Ln
Posts: 46,075
Blog Entries: 10
LOL there are how many states wating in line to get these losers?

just send em to Texas....
__________________

The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them
The family that shoots together has interlocking fields of fire




EG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-02, 08:04 PM   #16
ImaGirl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 540
what does it really matter whether or not they're terrorists? they're shit heads who think they should just go around killing people they dont even know....WHAT THE CRAP?!
__________________

My love is like...wo
My kiss is like...wo
My touch is like...wo
My sex is like...wo
My ass is like...wo
My body’s like...wo

*mwuah*
ImaGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-02, 10:53 PM   #17
opus512
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cherry Capitol of the World, Bitch!
Posts: 71,507
Quote:
Originally posted by ImaGirl
what does it really matter whether or not they're terrorists? they're shit heads who think they should just go around killing people they dont even know....WHAT THE CRAP?!
What matters is if the authorities rely on untested new laws and screw up in court.
__________________

We're all Nero, and we're all playing cheap plastic Chinese fiddles.

When the Rebels become the Tyrants, Revolution takes on a New Meaning.

The only truth that I fear is the dominance of opinion over thought, of partisan ideology over compromise, of emotional self righteous morality over intellectual reasoning.

"We must always take heed that we buy no more from strangers than we sell them, for so should we impoverish ourselves and enrich them."
--- Sir. Thomas Smith, England, 1549.
opus512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-02, 11:16 PM   #18
EG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corner of Kiss My Butt Ave and No Friggin Way Ln
Posts: 46,075
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by opus512


What matters is if the authorities rely on untested new laws and screw up in court.
LOL.... they have states waitin in line for these losers
__________________

The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them
The family that shoots together has interlocking fields of fire




EG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-02, 01:36 AM   #19
opus512
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cherry Capitol of the World, Bitch!
Posts: 71,507
Quote:
Originally posted by EGhadsGhost


LOL.... they have states waitin in line for these losers
Uhm, double jepordy? If one state screws it up, they screw it up for all of them then the feds would have to step in and sue them for violating the victims civil rights or some bullshit.

Not saying it's going to happen, I just don't see the big rush to try them under new laws, except for a behind the scenes push from the Jr administration to get some precedents going on his new rules.
__________________

We're all Nero, and we're all playing cheap plastic Chinese fiddles.

When the Rebels become the Tyrants, Revolution takes on a New Meaning.

The only truth that I fear is the dominance of opinion over thought, of partisan ideology over compromise, of emotional self righteous morality over intellectual reasoning.

"We must always take heed that we buy no more from strangers than we sell them, for so should we impoverish ourselves and enrich them."
--- Sir. Thomas Smith, England, 1549.
opus512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-02, 01:49 AM   #20
GrimFaceOfReality
Aurum User
 
GrimFaceOfReality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 9,299
Quote:
Originally posted by opus512


Uhm, double jepordy? If one state screws it up, they screw it up for all of them then the feds would have to step in and sue them for violating the victims civil rights or some bullshit.
Not exactly true - each state would be trying them for different crimes committed in each state. If they were to be acquitted in Virginia for the 3 murders committed there, Maryland could then prosecute them for different murders committed on its territory, then Alabama, and so forth. Even if every state were to fail, Federal government could still prosecute them for all the federal violations.

That said, I agree that Virginia is making things overly complicated. Just try them for murder and be done with it.
__________________

"Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines."

"Success comes from good judgement, good judgment comes from experience, experience comes from bad judgement."

"For a century and a half now, America and Japan have formed one of the great and enduring alliances of modern times."— Bush The Second, Tokyo, February 18, 2002

"Can one claim to combat hate, aggression and intolerance when one’s methods are hateful, aggressive, and intolerant?"

www.maxthon.com IE/Unsuck

Last edited by GrimFaceOfReality; 12-04-02 at 01:52 AM..
GrimFaceOfReality is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Post Reply


Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Everything (at least the good stuff) posted here is © Copyright 2000-2006 slackercentral.com,
and may only be reprinted with permission or by the original author. Real slackers use The Opera Browser.
Best viewed while you're supposed to be working.